Beggars Beware

Charity invariably ends up reinforcing the axiom, “No good deed will go unpunished.”

Charity is doing for others what they should have done for themselves but were too lazy to do so.

Charity is false compassion. Real compassion helps people in need; charity (false compassion) helps people stay in need. Poverty is not a shame—it’s a disgrace. Any man who allows his children to wallow in the indignities of poverty is no man at all. He is a selfish boy with an itch and sperm.

Anyone who gives money to help people who cannot/will not control their lives is contributing to continuing the pain that is caused by this lack of control. True charity means taking the children away from the poor and doing something useful and productive with them. Then, take the people who produced the child and failed to take adequate care of him/her and confine them to hard labor, deprivation, and torment.

Human beings who are starving are a disgrace to reason. There is only one thing that separates us from the lower orders and that is reason. Therefore, human beings who fail to uphold their mandate to be noble need to be disposed of.

They are an affront to all that our Creator meant for us, and our Creator would surely applaud our use of reason to rid the world of those who were a pollution.

Make no mistake—the poor are pollution of the worst kind, unless they are made poor by powers of the reasonable. If the playing field is reasonably level, then poverty is a choice, not an imposition nor an inevitability.

Having less than another is not poverty. Having less than is needed IS poverty. If opportunities abound for one to have enough of what is needed for survival, then poverty is to be punished, not pitied.

Ridding the world of those who refuse to work hard enough and smart enough to keep them and their offspring out of poverty, is incumbent upon those of us who do what is necessary to prevent this slip into the slime.

Reason comes with a price; poverty comes with an excuse.

Quite frankly, the way things are going now must be ended. The poor are not paying the price that their poverty exacts upon society. They, not the rich, should be taxed and beaten into economic oblivion. The poor are a blot upon the Creator’s creation.

If arrogance results from achievement, and that arrogance results in a willful, deliberate state of inflexible social position, then of course reason is to be held in contempt. But, make not mistake, it is the individual who should be held in contempt, not reason itself.

The possession of reason does not preclude the desire for arrogant dominance. As a matter of fact, reason allows us to see that dominance without merit is possible, if force (be it physical or legal) is brought to bear.

Those were the French aristocrats who were summarily executed by the very Age of Reason they propagated. The ironies of the French Revolution are such that the arrogant of our own age should be wary of surviving on and trading on their own arrogance.

Enforced poverty is a condition that excuses violence to overthrow the “haves.” But poverty that exists in a social milieu that allows ascensions and declines by merit is just willful negligence and dereliction by the parties involved.

The poor, in that situation, sould be punished for being poor. Charity merely rewards them for being losers.

So let us not let our reason and our judgment be clouded by our emotions. The truly inferior should be treated with disdain, when the inferior are blessed with reason. This is why animals must be protected by those of us with reason. But we should spit on those with reason who refuse to use it.

Animals, in that regard, are morally superior to human beings who choose to be losers. Human beings who are poor should be eliminated from the human scene, not fed and nourished and allowed to continue.

Compassion must be limited to those who are truly helpless or are truly inferior. I’ve no time for false charity that encourages the able-bodied and able-minded among us.

Important Note: When I say "eliminated" and such, I am NOT advocating killing those people. However, I do not have a problem with rounding them up and restricting their freedoms.